- #How to install glibc package ubuntu manual
- #How to install glibc package ubuntu upgrade
- #How to install glibc package ubuntu Offline
- #How to install glibc package ubuntu plus
- #How to install glibc package ubuntu professional
But if you’re a professional and work faster using the CLI, this option is still there.
PC-BSD’s developers did a great job providing tools for nearly everything that can be done via CLI, such as upgrading the system, installing applications and configuring services. If you don’t want to use the CLI, you don’t have to. Most of this documentation can be applied to PC-BSD, because in fact it’s the same OS.Īs far as being more “command-line focused” once your DE is setup, it is no more “command-line focused” than Linux.
#How to install glibc package ubuntu Offline
Next to the offline material accessible via the man command and the doc/ subtrees, there’s the FreeBSD handbook and other interesting stuff. Most ports follow this good idea, except, “of course”, the big desktop environments (that don’t seem to have adequate offline documentation), sadly.
#How to install glibc package ubuntu manual
Every part of the OS has a manual page: system tools, kernel interfaces, library calls, configuration files and maintenance operations. As a developer, this is of highest importance to me.
Unlike the most Linusi, the BSDs are documented very well. That’s what I do since FreeBSD 4.0 without any problems. I used FreeBSD for a desktop for a few years, and while initial setup was a bit of work, it was the most stable desktop I have ever used.
#How to install glibc package ubuntu plus
I would think that linux sharing resources and libraries etc amongs all the various distros is a big plus since everyone contributes and everyone benefits.Įach to their own – my answer to the kubuntu (or other linux distro) user is that if you’re happy with your linux distro and the direction linux is taking, then BSD will probably not be for you…
#How to install glibc package ubuntu upgrade
Ok so thats all the negatives…any positives?Īctually the only thing that would interest me from that list is the in-place upgrade -which debian (and derivatives) has been able to do for years now…and upgrading via binary packages is a hell of a lot quicker than upgrading from source…anyone have a spare couple of days while your pc compiles all your software? People will help, but they do expect you try to be independent, they will not hold your hand every step of the way through. The BSDs are much more command line focused and is not interested in developing anything to be user friendly. – Gilboa “Should I really point out that NetBSD != OpenBSD != FreeBSD?” Davara So, you’re switching to FreeBSD, strait from your original OpenBSD comment, that had little to do with the actual subject. Heck, most of them support automated-off-the-net upgrade.įor a more thorough list, have a look here … Plus can just to a quick Linux BSD search for more list of differences While I hate upgrading (both my Linux and my BSD boxes) – seldom did I see a distribution that doesn’t support previous-version upgrade. In BSD you can upgrade to the new release from source, there is no need to erase it and install the new releaseįedora, Ubuntu, SUSE, Mandriva, … … Slackware, Gentoo. … Then again, no idea what this could be considered a winning feature. Just like Slackware, Gentoo and at least 200 different Linux distributions… what else is new? Which given the BSD distribution at hand (PC-BSD.
… Oh, and since when did NIH syndrome became a virtue? Heck, do you have any idea how many GNU GPL packages are on your system right now? Should I really count the number of non-OpenBSD packages in the OpenBSD ports tree? I use OpenBSD exclusively on a couple systems and dual boot OpenBSD on a couple others, but I gave up on Linux and have quit using it, already erased it from my main desktop system, but will try to answer.ĭon’t really see what OpenBSD has to do with the subject at hand – but it’s 01:30, I don’t feel like going to sleep, so I’ll bite…Įach BSD is developed and maintained by its own group – kernal, filesystem, centralized ports, system libraries, instead of getting different parts from different people.
0 kommentar(er)
